On November 10th 2009, the Architecture Museum of Ljubljana and the Pekinpah Association have released Sustainable alternatives in design: It's hight time we start losing time, a book of lectures in design theory edited by Barbara Predan and Cvetka Pozar.
Since the UN climate summit in Copenhagen has failed to provide an effective mechanism for curbing global warming, we are back searching for alternatives. We believe that design can and should offer alternatives in solving problems that stretch - as Walter Gropius has put it - from the spoon to the city. The book of lectures entitled Sustainable alternatives in design: It's hight time we start losing time offers heterogeneous and plausible alternatives which can help us to redefine the way we understand the role of design and its core idea - the notion that design is, in essence, a problem solving discipline.
Dieter Rams (Germany) | 6. 3. 2008
[ more ] Ezio Manzini (Italy) | 20. 3. 2008 [
more ] Jonathan Chapman (U.K.) | 8. 4. 2008 [
more ] Clive Dilnot (USA) | 13. 5. 2008 [
more ] Per Mollerup (Denmark) | 10. 6. 2008 [
more ] Victor Margolin (USA) | 3. 10. 2008 [
more ]
Sustainable alternatives in design: It’s high time we start losing
time
“Today we reject reflection not because it is dangerous or disturbing,
but because we lose time on it, because it ‘doesn’t serve any purpose’,
doesn’t serve to gain us more time. Success, after all, means gaining
more time.” Thus the French philosopher Jean-François Lyotard cynically
described the social logic of the present time in Le Différend
(1983).
In the field of design we measure success not only in the amount of time
gained but also in the number of products sold. The goal is to achieve
the largest possible market share, which, according to dry economic logic,
requires continual growth – growth is exalted above all else. Like the
tides of the sea, we observe in society an oscillation between a lesser
and a greater need to talk about responsibility. Those good old PR slogans
that preach about our attitudes towards the environment and society most
often surface only when a company wants to communicate with potential
customers – on the condition, of course, that they will bring it earned
profit.
But there are exceptions. There exists in design, mainly in theory and
in a few (very rare) cases of enlightened practice, a parallel world that
highlights, constructs and creates sustainable development and sustainable
design. The discrepancy between theory and practice demonstrates, perhaps,
that there is not enough theory and that the theory we do have describes
only a certain ideal image of the discipline. Practice, meanwhile – if
we can play a little with a notion developed by Alain Badiou – accepts
in their entirety the maxims of the already-established “Western” system
instead of searching out the conditions for a new politics of collective
emancipation (Alain Badiou, L’Éthique, 1993). Badiou’s idea,
then, gives us hope that all is not yet lost.
Roughly, we can say that today in design there exists a confrontation
between, on the one hand, a desire for society’s continual improvement
and, on the other, resignation and doubt that the progress we see is really
the way to attain the kind of cosmopolitan society Kant foretold at the
end of the 18th century. There is a third way, too – one we might call
Badiou’s way – which tries to show that the current discrepancy between
theory and practice is merely an emancipatory stage that promises a new
state of affairs and, consequently, creates a rift in consciousness.
The main purpose of the present series of lectures will be, in fact, to
outline certain presuppositions for a new state of affairs, a new politics
of collective emancipation – we might even call it a sustainable ethics
of design.
Please join us. You may not earn anything that resembles
the classic notion of “profit”, but as the Roman Club discovered back
in 1972, while there may exist limits to material growth, there is
no limit to learning.